Critical Reflection
In his book Becoming a Critical Reflective Teacher Stephen Brookfield disc usses what it means to be critically reflective as a teacher. He defines reflection as hunting down and examining the assumptions we have. This is a definition that makes sense and provides a concrete model to follow. His examples though seem extreme and unrealistic. He sets up a serious of "common sense" examples that he then disproves. For instance, "It's common sense that teaching is essentially mysterious, so if we try to dissect it or understand its essence, we will kill it." Does anyone really believe that let alone think it is "common sense"? Obviously not all reflection is critical, so what makes reflection critical? According to Brookfield , two things. First is to "understand how consideration of power undergrid , frame and distort" the processes and interactions. The second component is to "question assumption and practices that seem to make